✦ Bombay High Court · 10 Sep 2008

Thane-II v. Thane & Ors.

D K DESHMUKH, P DEVADHAR

Case at a glance

Provisions considered

Judgment

Heard learned counsel appearing for the sides. The impugned been made Tribunal recording a finding payment malafide intention therefore provisions section 11D of the Central Excise Act 1944 do not apply. No question of law arises. Appeal is rejected. . Parties to act on the copy of this order duly authenticated by the Associate / Private Secretary of the Court. . Certified copy is expedited. ( D.K. DESHMUKH J.) ( J.P. DEVADHAR J.)

Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case

No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.

This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.

Why is this linked?

This is the original judgment text, reproduced from the public court record. Always verify it against the official record before relying on it in a filing — check it on Bombay High Court or eCourts case status. ← Search more judgments