Principal Commissioner of Income Tax, Mumbai v. Pratiksha Shah
Case at a glance
Outcome
Dismissed
The appeal is dismissed as
Key paragraphs
- Para 22. Leave, as prayed for, is granted. The appeal is dismissed as withdrawn.
Judgment
Mr.Arvind Pinto, Advocate for appellant. **** CORAM : DHIRAJ SINGH THAKUR AND VALMIKI SA MENEZES, JJ. DATE : 14th SEPTEMBER 2022 PC :
Learned counsel for the appellant, on instructions, seeks leave to withdraw the appeal.
Operative part
Leave, as prayed for, is granted. The appeal is dismissed as withdrawn.
Refund of court fees, if any, as per Rules. [VALMIKI SA MENEZES, J.] [DHIRAJ SINGH THAKUR, J.] Shraddha Talekar, PS
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: The appeal is dismissed as
Which court decided this case, and when?
Bombay High Court, on 14 Sep 2022. The bench was THAKUR, VALMIKI MENEZES, DHIRAJ SINGH THAKUR.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.