The Commisioner of Central Excise v. M/s.S.G.Phyoto Pharma Pvt.Ltd
Case at a glance
Provisions considered
Judgment
Mr.Kundal Chaudhary with P.A.Vays & S.D.Bhosale for the Appellant. Mr.P.V.Patankar for the Respondent. :- DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN & CORAM :- DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN & CORAM :- DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN & CORAM BORA, JJ. SANTOSH BORA, JJ. SANTOSH BORA, JJ. SANTOSH : 25TH APRIL, 2008 DATEDATEDATE : 25TH APRIL, 2008 : 25TH APRIL, 2008 P.C.P.C.P.C. 1. Heard the learned Counsel for the parties. By Notice Motion, Appellant seeking condonation 45 days’ caused filing Appeal. Perused Notice Motion Affidavit-in-support thereof. For reasons stated therein sufficient condoning delay. There inaction, negligence bonafide Appellant. Hence, the Notice of Motion is made absolute in terms of prayer clause (a).
#2. Place the Appeal on board for admission in the month of September,2008, subject to numbering. BORA,J.) (DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN,J.) (SANTOSH BORA,J.) (DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN,J.) (SANTOSH BORA,J.) (DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN,J.) (SANTOSH
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.