AGNI-Action for Good Governance v. Municipal Mazdoor Union and Allied Unions & Ors.
Case at a glance
Outcome
Disposed of
Writ petition is disposed of accordingly
Provisions considered
Key paragraphs
- Para 55. Writ petition is disposed of accordingly. (R.M. LODHA,J.) LODHA,J.) (R.M. (R.M. LODHA,J.) BAGGA,J.) (A.S. BAGGA,J.) (A.S. BAGGA,J.) (A.S.
Judgment
Shri Commissioner S.G.Kale, Shri All therein. Karmachari members Kruti October Mumbai Samiti revision Municipal allied Pay Honourable Court Ex-Municipal A.B.Maduskar, unions Mumbai Samiti The June regarding P.R.C.has 24th (c) report recommendations Allowance, Assistance, Medical Monthly The allowances. II regarding manpower requirements, works norms and productivity. Transport P.R.C. House report Rent submitted Part 1 2004 contain Pay, Allowance, Subsidy Leave Allowance submit therein Dearness Travel Allowance, Part agreement The (d) D.A. and its neutralization as per the report and recommendations of the P.R.C. unions agreed In (e) agreed Arbitrator under Section 10A of Industrial 31st March 2005 resolve dispute parties following 5th separate April dispute Agreements 2005 3 Disputes Act, 1947: "Whether 2000 Municipal Mumbai neutralization Committee employees, neutralization recommendation Committee. be rate of D.A. and its neutralisation?" recommendations 31st Corporation period March 1st 2005, D.A. existence D.A. Pay If Pay neither, April Greater employees Revision Revision should
#4. The aforesaid matters dispute having referred Justice S.P.Bharucha arbitrator Section 10A Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, satisfied grievance raised petitioner the writ petition does not deserve to be gone into by us.
#5. Writ petition is disposed of accordingly. (R.M. LODHA,J.) LODHA,J.) (R.M. (R.M. LODHA,J.) BAGGA,J.) (A.S. BAGGA,J.) (A.S. BAGGA,J.) (A.S.
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: Writ petition is disposed of accordingly
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 — s. 10A; Disputes Act, 1947.
Which court decided this case, and when?
Bombay High Court, on 08 Jun 2006. The bench was A S BAGGA.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.