No. 925 OF 2006 IN SUIT No. 34 OF 2001 Suresh Enterprises v. Champaben C. Ashar & Ors.
Case at a glance
Provisions considered
Key paragraphs
- Para 44. Appeal accordingly stands disposed of. No order as to costs. KHANDEPARKAR, J.] G. KARNIK, J.] [R.M.S. KHANDEPARKAR, J.] [D. G. KARNIK, J.] [R.M.S. [D. KHANDEPARKAR, J.] G. KARNIK, J.] [R.M.S. [D.
Judgment
Mr. Ravi Kadam, Sr. Advocate with Mr. A. Bookwala, Sr. Advocate with Ashosh Kamath i/b for Applicant. Mr. Shailesh Shah with Mr. Amit Shrof, Advocate for respondent no.2 to 4. CORAM : R. M. S. KHANDEPARKAR : R. M. S. KHANDEPARKAR CORAM CORAM : R. M. S. KHANDEPARKAR ANDANDAND D.D.D. G. KARNIK, JJ. G. KARNIK, JJ. G. KARNIK, JJ. DATEDATEDATE : JUNE 7, 2007. : JUNE 7, 2007. : JUNE 7, 2007. PCPCPC :- :- :- . Heard. Admit. By consent heard forthwith. The learned advocate Mr. Shailesh Shah waives service respondent Nos. 2 4, submits respondent No.1 expired respondent Nos. 2 to 4 are the legal heirs of respondent No.1.
#2. By consent, the impugned order is - 2 - hereby matter remanded learned Single Judge decide Application O. 21, Rule 22 Civil Procedure Code afresh, accordance provisions law. Liberty parties evidence accordance provisions law, support contentions. In circumstances of the case, the matter is remanded for the expeditious disposal.
#3. Meanwhile the order of directing status-quo continue learned Single Judge passes otherwise proceeding. It expressed opinion the points raised in the matter, on merits and all the issues issues are kept open.
#4. Appeal accordingly stands disposed of. No order as to costs. KHANDEPARKAR, J.] G. KARNIK, J.] [R.M.S. KHANDEPARKAR, J.] [D. G. KARNIK, J.] [R.M.S. [D. KHANDEPARKAR, J.] G. KARNIK, J.] [R.M.S. [D.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.