✦ Bombay High Court · 15 Feb 2007

Rekha A. Bhatia v. Anil H. Bhatia & Ors.

Case at a glance

Provisions considered

Judgment

15th February 2007 passed Notice Motion No. 2559

#2006. By impugned , learned Single Judge dismissed application condonation delay, observing Review Petition itself arise. maintainable, question condoning filing Review Petition The observation taking consideration - 2 - sought reviewed subject decision appellant, though subsequently withdrawn appeal preferred appeal 3-5-2006. Considering provisions Section 114 Code Civil Procedure, clearly provides a review relation except appeal preferred, The impugned order. learned counsel appearing appellant fairly conceded appeal against sought reviewed, incompetent appeal. Being so, impugned suffer illegality or infirmity and does not warrant any intereference in the order. [D. G. KARNIK, J.] [R.M.S. G. KARNIK, J.] [R.M.S. KHANDEPARKAR, J.] KHANDEPARKAR, J.] [D. [D. G. KARNIK, J.] [R.M.S. KHANDEPARKAR, J.]

Questions this judgment answers

Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?

Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 — s. 114.

Which court decided this case, and when?

Bombay High Court, on 15 Feb 2007. The bench was KHANDEPARKAR ANDANDAND, D D D G KARNIK, G KARNIK, D G KARNIK, R M S G KARNIK, R M S KHANDEPARKAR.

Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case

No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.

This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.

Why is this linked?

This is the original judgment text, reproduced from the public court record. Always verify it against the official record before relying on it in a filing — check it on Bombay High Court or eCourts case status (search case no. ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION APPEAL No. 389 of 2007). ← Search more judgments