OF 2004 INCOME The Commissioner of Income Tax, City - XI, Mumbai v. Subodh Mukherji Productions
Case at a glance
- Order date
- 27 Aug 2007
- Bench
- P DEVADHAR, DEVADHAR, P P DEVADHAR, P REBELLO
Provisions considered
Key paragraphs
- Para 22. The Motion along with the Appeal stands dismissed as withdrawn. Refund of Court fees as per rules. C.C. expedited. DEVADHAR, J.] [J.P. DEVADHAR, J.] [J.P. DEVADHAR, J.] [J.P. REBELLO, J.] [F.I. REBELLO, J.] [F.I. REBELLO, J.] [F.I.
Judgment
THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY INININ THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORDINARY NOTICE OF MOTION NO.1252 OF 2004 OF MOTION NO.1252 OF 2004 NOTICE OF MOTION NO.1252 OF 2004 NOTICE WITH WITHWITH TAX APPEAL (L.) NO.321 OF 2004 INCOME TAX APPEAL (L.) NO.321 OF 2004 INCOME TAX APPEAL (L.) NO.321 OF 2004 INCOME The Commissioner of Income Tax, City - XI, Mumbai V/s. Subodh Mukherji Productions . ...Appellant ...Respondent Mr.A.N. Kotangale i/b. Pankaj Kapoor for the Appellant. Mr.A.K. Jasani for the Respondent. : F.I. REBELLO & CORAM : F.I. REBELLO & CORAM : F.I. REBELLO & CORAM J.P. DEVADHAR,JJ. DEVADHAR,JJ. J.P.J.P. DEVADHAR,JJ. DATE : 27TH AUGUST, 2007. : 27TH AUGUST, 2007. DATEDATE : 27TH AUGUST, 2007. P.C. : : : P.C.P.C.
Considering the judgment of the Supreme Court reported in 273 ITR (1), the learned Counsel seeks leave to withdraw the Appeal.
The Motion along with the Appeal stands dismissed as withdrawn. Refund of Court fees as per rules. C.C. expedited. DEVADHAR, J.] [J.P. DEVADHAR, J.] [J.P. DEVADHAR, J.] [J.P. REBELLO, J.] [F.I. REBELLO, J.] [F.I. REBELLO, J.] [F.I.
Questions this judgment answers
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Code of Civil Procedure, 1908.
Which court decided this case, and when?
Bombay High Court, on 27 Aug 2007. The bench was P DEVADHAR, DEVADHAR, P P DEVADHAR, P REBELLO.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.