Jet Airways (India) Pvt. Ltd v. Mr. Mukut Pathak
Case at a glance
Provisions considered
Judgment
Mr. Mukut Pathak ... Respondent Ms. Vishakha Vaswani, Advocate i/b M/s. V. V. Juris for Appelant. None for the respondent. CORAM : R. M. S. KHANDEPARKAR : R. M. S. KHANDEPARKAR CORAM CORAM : R. M. S. KHANDEPARKAR ANDANDAND D.D.D. G. KARNIK, JJ. G. KARNIK, JJ. G. KARNIK, JJ. DATEDATEDATE : JUNE 7, 2007. : JUNE 7, 2007. : JUNE 7, 2007. PCPCPC :- :- :- . The learned advocate appearing for the appellant states appeal refusal interlocutory injunction Appellant operate 11th October 2005, appeal become infructuous pressed. Appeal therefore is allowed to be withdrawn. No order as to costs. - 2 -
#2. Needless to say that the withdrawal of the appeal will be without prejudice to the rights and contentions of both the parties to the suit and the learned Single Judge hearing the suit shall not be influenced by the prima facie, observations/findings contained in the impugned order and judgment dated 17th April
#2007. Sd/- [D. G. KARNIK, J.] [R.M.S. G. KARNIK, J.] [R.M.S. KHANDEPARKAR, J.] KHANDEPARKAR, J.] [D. [D. G. KARNIK, J.] [R.M.S. KHANDEPARKAR, J.] Sd/-
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.