Pravin v. Greater Mumbai & Anr.
Case at a glance
- Decided
- 03 Mar 2006
- Bench
- ABHAY S OKA, H L GOKHALE
Key paragraphs
- Para 11. Heard the Advocates appearing for the parties. In view of the averments made in the affidavit-in-reply in support of the Notice of Motion, a case is made out for restoration of the Writ Petition which was dismissed for default. Accordingly, the Notice of Motion…
Judgment
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION NOTICE OF MOTION NO.108 OF 2006 NOTICE OF MOTION NO.108 OF 2006 NOTICE OF MOTION NO.108 OF 2006 INININ WRIT PETITION NO. 621 OF 1994 WRIT PETITION NO. 621 OF 1994 WRIT PETITION NO. 621 OF 1994 Pravin s/o. Govind Kalbhor ...Petitioner Vs. Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai & Anr. ...Respondents Shri A.V. Anturkar i/by Shri A.S. Dubey for the Petitioner. Ms Aruna Savla for the Respondents. CORAM : SHRI H.L.GOKHALE & CORAM : SHRI H.L.GOKHALE & CORAM : SHRI H.L.GOKHALE & ABHAY S. OKA, JJ. ABHAY S. OKA, JJ. ABHAY S. OKA, JJ. DATE : MARCH 03, 2006. DATE : MARCH 03, 2006. DATE : MARCH 03, 2006. PER A.S.OKA, J: PER A.S.OKA, J: PER A.S.OKA, J:
Heard the Advocates appearing for the parties. In view of the averments made in the affidavit-in-reply in support of the Notice of Motion, a case is made out for restoration of the Writ Petition which was dismissed for default. Accordingly, the Notice of Motion is made absolute in terms of prayers (a), (b) and (c). (H.L.GOKHALE,J.)
(A.S.OKA,J.)
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.