✦ Bombay High Court · 17 Aug 2026

Priya Soparkar v. The Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai

Writ Petition No. 2575 of 2024ADVAIT M SETHNA, SUMAN SHYAM

Case at a glance

Outcome

Disposed of

counsel, this Petition stands disposed of, as infructuous

Key paragraphs

  • Para 22. In view of the above submission made by the Petitioner’s counsel, this Petition stands disposed of, as infructuous. (ADVAIT M. SETHNA, J.) (SUMAN SHYAM, J.) { PRIYA RAJESH SOPARKAR Digitally signed by PRIYA RAJESH SOPARKAR 11:41:05 +0530

Judgment

Ms. Dipti Salunke i/by Mr. Abhijeet Kandarkar, for the Petitioner. CORAM: SUMAN SHYAM & ADVAIT M. SETHNA, JJ. DATED: 17th AUGUST 2026. PC:-

1.

Ms. Dipti Salunke, learned counsel appearing for the Petitioner submits that the Writ Petition has become infructuous. The same be, accordingly, closed.

Operative part

2.

In view of the above submission made by the Petitioner’s counsel, this Petition stands disposed of, as infructuous. (ADVAIT M. SETHNA, J.) (SUMAN SHYAM, J.) { PRIYA RAJESH SOPARKAR Digitally signed by PRIYA RAJESH SOPARKAR 11:41:05 +0530

Questions this judgment answers

What did the Court decide in this case?

The Court recorded the following disposition: counsel, this Petition stands disposed of, as infructuous

Which court decided this case, and when?

Bombay High Court, on 17 Aug 2026. The bench was ADVAIT M SETHNA, SUMAN SHYAM.

Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case

No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.

This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.

Why is this linked?

This is the original judgment text, reproduced from the public court record. Always verify it against the official record before relying on it in a filing — check it on Bombay High Court or eCourts case status (search case no. Writ Petition No. 2575 of 2024). ← Search more judgments