Judgment · High Court · 2005
Case at a glance
Key paragraphs
- Para 77. Chamber summons stands disposed of. J.) (R.M.LODHA, J.) (R.M.LODHA, J.) (R.M.LODHA, G. KARNIK, J.) (D. G. KARNIK, J.) (D. G. KARNIK, J.) (D.
Judgment
Ms.Ritu Singh for Mr.G.K.Masand for the applicants. Mr.S.R.Rajguru for the respondents. CORAM : R.M. LODHA & D.G. KARNIK, JJ. DATED : 21st November 2005 P.C. The appellant-Pamo Thakurdas Lala
25.7.1999. His by means this chamber summons pray for bringing them on record after condoning the delay.
The chamber summons substitution
15.1.2000. It making application substitution time, reasons stated affidavit support chamber summons, satisfied applicants were prevented by sufficient cause in making the application in time.
The respondents have not chosen to file any reply in 2 opposition to the chamber summons.
We satisfied chamber summons deserves to be granted in terms of prayers (a), (b), (c) and (d). We grant the chamber summons accordingly.
Prayers (a), (b), (c) and (d) read thus: (a) That delay in taking out the present chamber summons be kindly condoned. That (b) pleased to set aside the abatment of the Appeal. Hon’ble Court graciously Applicants That respectively (c) s/o. in place and stead of the original appellant as his heirs and legal representatives. Thakurdas Appeal present Lala herein, deceased appellant Appellant brought nos. Shri record 1a Pam 1b That (d) granted liberty to carry out necessary amendments. wherever necessary, Applicants
Necessary amendment be carried out within two weeks from today.
Chamber summons stands disposed of. J.) (R.M.LODHA, J.) (R.M.LODHA, J.) (R.M.LODHA, G. KARNIK, J.) (D. G. KARNIK, J.) (D. G. KARNIK, J.) (D.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.