V/s v. M/s.Nahar Estate P.Ltd
Case at a glance
Outcome
Dismissed
Appeal is dismissed in limine with no order
Provisions considered
Key paragraphs
- Para 33. as to costs. Appeal is dismissed in limine with no order J.) (J.P.DEVADHAR, J.) J.) (J.P.DEVADHAR, (J.P.DEVADHAR, J.) (V.C.DAGA J.) J.) (V.C.DAGA (V.C.DAGA
Judgment
THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY INININ THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORDINARY TAX APPEAL NO. 355 OF 2009 INCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 355 OF 2009 INCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 355 OF 2009 INCOME The Commissioner of Income-tax-5, Mumbai. V/s. ... Appellant. M/s.Nahar Estate P.Ltd. ... Respondent. Suresh Kumar for the appellant. M.L.Chaturvedi for the respondent. : V.C.DAGA AND J.P.DEVADHAR, JJ. CORAM : V.C.DAGA AND J.P.DEVADHAR, JJ. CORAM : V.C.DAGA AND J.P.DEVADHAR, JJ. CORAM : 20th April 2009. DATED : 20th April 2009. DATED : 20th April 2009. DATED P.C.P.C.P.C. : : : ---- -------- . parties. Perused appeal. Heard learned counsel for the rival
Both questions sought to be raised in this appeal decided C.I.T.(Appeals) Tribunal appreciation evidence recording concurrent findings fact. Since questions are revolving around appreciation of evidence, no substantial question of law is involved.
Operative part
as to costs. Appeal is dismissed in limine with no order J.) (J.P.DEVADHAR, J.) J.) (J.P.DEVADHAR, (J.P.DEVADHAR, J.) (V.C.DAGA J.) J.) (V.C.DAGA (V.C.DAGA
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: Appeal is dismissed in limine with no order
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Code of Civil Procedure, 1908.
Which court decided this case, and when?
Bombay High Court, on 20 Apr 2009. The bench was V C DAGA, P DEVADHAR.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.