Deepak Namjoshi Anr v. Khatoon Dawood Khan Anr
Case at a glance
Outcome
Allowed
Accordingly, the Writ Petitions are allowed to be withdrawn
Provisions considered
- Limitation Act, 1963 s. 14
Key paragraphs
- Para 33. Accordingly, the Writ Petitions are allowed to be withdrawn and disposed of as such with liberty to avail an alternate remedy.
Judgment
Mr. Rizwan Merchant a/w. Mr. Sagar L. Shete and Mr. Akash Ghadage, for the Petitioners. Mr. P. P. Jadhav, APP, for the Respondent-State. CORAM: MADHAV J. JAMDAR, J. DATED : 19th AUGUST 2026 P. C.:
#1. In all these Writ Petitions, the orders challenged are the orders of issuance of process in the following three different complaints: Sonali 914-WP-5895-2024+.DOC Writ Petition Sr. Number No. 1. 5895/2024 2. 5896/2024 3. 5897/2024 Case No. Date of the Order Court Name 2443/MISC/2017 11/12/2020 Metropolitan 827/MISC/2018 17/02/2020 301/MISC/2018 11/12/2020 Magistrate, 65th Court, Andheri, Mumbai.
#2. Mr. Merchant, learned Counsel appearing for the Petitioners, on instructions of the Petitioners, seeks withdrawal of the Writ Petitions, as there is an alternate remedy available to the Petitioners to challenge the impugned order.
#3. Accordingly, the Writ Petitions are allowed to be withdrawn and disposed of as such with liberty to avail an alternate remedy.
#4. It is clarified that these Writ Petitions are filed in this Court on 26th November 2024 and are being disposed of today, therefore, the Petitioners will get benefit of Section 14 of the Limitation Act, 1963 from 26th November 2024 to 19th August 2026.
#5. It is clarified that all contentions are kept open. [MADHAV J. JAMDAR, J.] Sonali
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: Accordingly, the Writ Petitions are allowed to be withdrawn
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Limitation Act, 1963 — s. 14.
Which court decided this case, and when?
Bombay High Court, on 19 Aug 2026. The bench was MADHAV JAMDAR.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.