Niranjan P. Raval & Ors. v. M/s. Shree Tirupati Developers and Builders & Anr.
Case at a glance
- Order date
- 13 Dec 2023
- Bench
- AMIT BORKAR
Provisions considered
Key paragraphs
- Para 33. Permission, as prayed for, is granted. The writ petition is, therefore, disposed of as withdrawn with liberty as prayed for. (AMIT BORKAR, J.) 1
Judgment
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.15422 OF 2023 Niranjan P. Raval & Ors … Petitioners V/s. M/s. Shree Tirupati Developers and Builders Through Its Partners & Anr … Respondents Mr. Ashok Gade, for Peititoner a/w. Ms. Riya John, for Petitioners. Mr. Sagar Joshi, for Respondents. CORAM : AMIT BORKAR, J. DATED : DECEMBER 13, 2023 P.C.:
Since, the suit is fixed for judgment, learned Advocate for the petitioners on instructions seeks permission to withdraw the writ petition with liberty to challenge the impugned order in an appeal under Section 105 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, in case the suit is decided against the petitioner.
Permission, as prayed for, is granted. The writ petition is, therefore, disposed of as withdrawn with liberty as prayed for. (AMIT BORKAR, J.) 1
Questions this judgment answers
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 — s. 105.
Which court decided this case, and when?
Bombay High Court, on 13 Dec 2023. The bench was AMIT BORKAR.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.