✦ Bombay High Court

Dixit v. The State of Maharashtra, Thru' Andheri Police Station, Mumbai & Ors.

Writ Petition No. 4364 of 2012S S SHINDE

Case at a glance

Outcome

Disposed of

The Petition is disposed of by keeping all the contentions open

Provisions considered

Key paragraphs

  • Para 22. At this stage, Petition challenging only show cause notice need not be entertained. The Petition is disposed of by keeping all the contentions open. [S.S. SHINDE, J.] [A.S. OKA, J.]

Judgment

Ms. Rashmi Gagwani, i/by Mr. Ganesh Gole, for the Petitioner. Mr. K.V. Saste, A.P.P., for the Respondent-State. CORAM : A.S. OKA & S.S. SHINDE, JJ. DATE : 21 ST DECEMBER, 2012. P.C. :

1.

The challenge in this Writ Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India is to the show cause notice issued under Section 59 of the Bombay Police Act, 1951. The Petitioner has already replied to the show cause notice. It is open for the Petitioner to rely upon the contentions raised in this Petition before the concerned Authority.

Operative part

2.

At this stage, Petition challenging only show cause notice need not be entertained. The Petition is disposed of by keeping all the contentions open. [S.S. SHINDE, J.]

[A.S. OKA, J.]

Questions this judgment answers

What did the Court decide in this case?

The Court recorded the following disposition: The Petition is disposed of by keeping all the contentions open

Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?

Constitution of India — art. 226; Bombay Police Act, 1951 — s. 59.

Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case

No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.

This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.

Why is this linked?

This is the original judgment text, reproduced from the public court record. Always verify it against the official record before relying on it in a filing — check it on Bombay High Court or eCourts case status (search case no. Writ Petition No. 4364 of 2012). ← Search more judgments