✦ Bombay High Court · 31 Jul 2026

Bharat Mavji Chheda & Anr. v. The State of Maharashtra & Ors.

Judgment

Mr. Ashish I. Satpute, A.P.P. for Respondent-State. Adv. P.P. Chavhan i/b Ms. Komal Punjabi for Respondent-BMC. _______________________________________ CORAM : A. S. GADKARI AND KAMAL KHATA, JJ. DATE : 31st July 2026 P.C. : 1) 2) None for the Petitioners when called out for hearing. Record indicates that, after 16th January 2020, neither the Petitioners nor their Advocates have taken any steps to circulate the Petition, even once.

2.1) It appears that, the Petitioners are not interested in pursuing the Petition. 3) Dismissed for non-prosecution. ( KAMAL KHATA, J. ) ( A.S. GADKARI, J. ) DNYANESHWAR TULSHIRAM GHUMNAR DNYANESHWAR TULSHIRAM GHUMNAR

Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case

No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.

This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.

Why is this linked?

This is the original judgment text, reproduced from the public court record. Always verify it against the official record before relying on it in a filing — check it on Bombay High Court or eCourts case status (search case no. Writ Petition No. 5403 of 2019). ← Search more judgments