✦ Bombay High Court · 31 Oct 2012

Dasharath Nagesh Bramhadande & Ors. v. Subhash Nagesh Bramhadande

Judgment

Mr.Datta H. Pawar, Advocate for the Applicants. .......... .......... CORAM : MRS.MRIDULA BHATKAR, J. DATE : 31ST OCTOBER 2012. P.C. 1 The application is moved for extension of time on the ground that applicant no.1-Dashrath Nagesh Bramhadande, who is 72 years old is bed ridden and as he is counting his last days of life, he wants to spend this years' Dassherra and Dipawali in the suit premises. Hence, it is submitted that the time be extended by three months to vacate the premises. 2 Along with this application, no documents are annexed to show the deteriorated heath of applicant no.1. Moreover, before this court on

30.01.2012, the applicants have submitted an under that they would vacate the suit premises within 9 months from the date of the order. The ms.s.k.talekar - 2 -

2.cas.1794.12 prod.doc period of 9 months got over yesterday. If at all, applicant no.1 was bed ridden since last 2-3 years, then the applicants should have moved this application earlier and not on the last date. The application is rejected. (JUDGE) ms.s.k.talekar

Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case

No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.

This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.

Why is this linked?

This is the original judgment text, reproduced from the public court record. Always verify it against the official record before relying on it in a filing — check it on Bombay High Court or eCourts case status (search case no. Civil Application No. 1794 of 2012). ← Search more judgments