Judgment · High Court · 2006
Case at a glance
Outcome
Dismissed
Appeal is dismissed
Provisions considered
Judgment
The view taken by the trial court is a possible view. It is not a case of wilful disobedience so as to invoke contempt action against the plaintiffs. No case is made out for interference with the impugned order. Appeal is dismissed.
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: Appeal is dismissed
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Code of Civil Procedure, 1908.
Which court decided this case, and when?
Bombay High Court, on 27 Feb 2006. The bench was A M KHANWILKAR.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.
This is the original judgment text, reproduced from the public court record.
Always verify it against the official record before relying on it in a filing — check it on
Bombay High Court or eCourts case status.
← Search more judgments