✦ Bombay High Court

Judgment · High Court

A M KHANWILKAR

Case at a glance

Outcome

Allowed

cause the application is allowed in

Provisions considered

Key paragraphs

  • Para 11. For the reasons mentioned in the application being sufficient cause the application is allowed in terms of prayer clauses (a) and (b).

Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE SIDE Crim. Application No. 8170 of 2005 Crim. Revision Appln. No. 268 of 2005 --------------------------------------------------- Office NOtes, Office Court or Judge’s Order Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court’s orders or directions and Registrar’s order --------------------------------------------------- Shri Purnekar i/b Shri Q.A.Siddique for applicant. Shri Y.S.Shinde, A.P.P. for respondent State. CORAM: A.M.KHANWILKAR J. CORAM: A.M.KHANWILKAR J. CORAM: A.M.KHANWILKAR J. 22nd December,2005. 22nd December,2005 22nd December,2005 P.C.P.C. P.C.

Operative part

1.

For the reasons mentioned in the application being sufficient cause the application is allowed in terms of prayer clauses (a) and (b).

Questions this judgment answers

What did the Court decide in this case?

The Court recorded the following disposition: cause the application is allowed in

Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?

Code of Civil Procedure, 1908.

Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case

No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.

This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.

Why is this linked?

This is the original judgment text, reproduced from the public court record. Always verify it against the official record before relying on it in a filing — check it on Bombay High Court or eCourts case status. ← Search more judgments