Judgment · High Court · 2011
Case at a glance
Provisions considered
Judgment
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE SIDE WRIT PETITION NO. 9119 OF 2011 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Court's or Judge's Orders Coram, appearances, Court's Orders or directions and Registrar's Orders Mr. C.K. Tripathi for the Petitioner. --- CORAM : G.S. GODBOLE, J. DATE : 15th NOVEMBER, 2011 P.C.:- 1 Not on Board. Taken on Board on production. 2 Heard Mr.Tripathi, Advocate for the Petitioner. The Petitioner has an alternate efficacious statutory remedy of filing Revision Application under Section 154 of the MCS Act,
1960. Hence, only on that ground the Writ Petition is not entertained since the Petitioner can always adopt that alternate remedy. Prima facie since the impugned order is passed in the Recovery Proceedings, the Registrar may not insist upon compliance of Section 154 (2A) of the MCS Act, 1960. All contentions of both the parties are kept open.
(G.S.GODBOLE, J.)
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.