Writ Petition No. 9238 of 2010 · Bombay High Court
Case at a glance
Provisions considered
- Constitution of India art. 227
Key paragraphs
- Para 11. Writ Petition is directed against a purely procedural and inter locutory order. The impugned order directs the parties to adduce evidence in respect of the Chamber Summons as well as Notice of Motion with liberty to the other party to cross examine. No interference…
Judgment
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE WRIT PETITION NO.9238 OF 2010 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Court's or Judge's Orders Coram, appearances, Court's Orders or directions and Registrar's Orders ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Mr.Mohit Jadhav for the petitioner. CORAM : D.G. KARNIK, J DATE : 6th December 2010 P.C. :
Writ Petition is directed against a purely procedural and inter locutory order. The impugned order directs the parties to adduce evidence in respect of the Chamber Summons as well as Notice of Motion with liberty to the other party to cross examine. No interference in exercise of an extra ordinary jurisdiction under Article 227 of the Constitution of India is called for. Writ Petiion is rejected summarily.
(D.G. KARNIK,J.)
Questions this judgment answers
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Constitution of India — art. 227.
Which court decided this case, and when?
Bombay High Court, on 06 Dec 2010. The bench was D G KARNIK.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.