✦ Bombay High Court

Shantaram D. Chavan v. Pramila G. More

Writ Petition No. 358 of 2007D Y CHANDRACHUD

Case at a glance

Outcome

Dismissed

The Writ Petition is dismissed

Provisions considered

Judgment

Operative part

adequate reasons in para 15 of the impugned judgment for confirming the order of the Learned Trial Judge, refusing to grant an interlocutory injunction. The Appellate Court has noted that a substantial part of the construction had already been completed and the First Defendant has filed an undertaking at Exh.12 that the construction would be demolished at her own cost in case the suit is decreed. No case for interference has been made out in the exercise of the supervisory jurisdiction of this Court under Article 227 of the Constitution of India. The Writ Petition is dismissed. ....

Questions this judgment answers

What did the Court decide in this case?

The Court recorded the following disposition: The Writ Petition is dismissed

Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?

Constitution of India — art. 227.

Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case

No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.

This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.

Why is this linked?

This is the original judgment text, reproduced from the public court record. Always verify it against the official record before relying on it in a filing — check it on Bombay High Court or eCourts case status (search case no. Writ Petition No. 358 of 2007). ← Search more judgments