✦ Bombay High Court · 18 Feb 2011

2010 IN SECOND APPEAL STAMP NO.27357 OF 2010 The State of Maharashtra v. Shri.Goraksha Namdeo Shinde

Case at a glance

Outcome

Allowed

Hence, delay is condoned and the Civil Application is allowed in

Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY. CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPLICATION NO.1720 OF 2010 IN SECOND APPEAL STAMP NO.27357 OF 2010 The State of Maharashtra V/s Shri. Goraksha Namdeo Shinde .. Applicant .. Respondent Ms.V.S.Mhaispurkar, AGP for the Applicant. CORAM: R.G.KETKAR, J. DATE : 18th February, 2011. P.C.: Heard the learned AGP for the applicant. This is an application for condonation of of 273 days delay caused in filing the appeal. For the reasons set out in the application, I am satisfied that the applicant has made out sufficient case for condoning the delay. Hence, delay is condoned and the Civil Application is allowed in terms of prayer clause (b), with no order as to costs. (R.G.KETKAR, J.)

Questions this judgment answers

What did the Court decide in this case?

The Court recorded the following disposition: Hence, delay is condoned and the Civil Application is allowed in

Which court decided this case, and when?

Bombay High Court, on 18 Feb 2011. The bench was R G KETKAR.

Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case

No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.

This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.

Why is this linked?

This is the original judgment text, reproduced from the public court record. Always verify it against the official record before relying on it in a filing — check it on Bombay High Court or eCourts case status (search case no. Civil Application No. 1720 of 2010). ← Search more judgments