Ambratlal @ Ambumal Samanomal Karia & Ors. v. State of Maharashtra & Ors.
Case at a glance
- Decided
- 03 Feb 2005
- Bench
- S A BOBDE, CHIEF S A BOBDE
Provisions considered
- Constitution of India art. 226
Judgment
Mr. J.S. Chandnani for the Petitioners Mr. N.P. Deshpande, Assistant Government Pleader, for the State. CORAM: DALVEER BHANDARI, C.J., & S. A. BOBDE, J. DATED: FEBRUARY 3, 2005. P.C.: This petition has been filed by the petitioners with the prayer to regularise their occupation of U. Nos. 97 and 98, Ulhasnagar. 2 Admittedly, the petitioners' father filed a suit before the Civil Judge with the prayer that the plaintiff be declared the absolute owner in respect of the said property situate at U.No. 97. Since that suit is pending before the concerned Court, this petition, invoking our extra-ordinary jurisdiction under Article 226 of the Constitution, cannot be entertained. This petition is accordingly dismissed. CHIEF JUSTICE S. A. BOBDE, J.
Questions this judgment answers
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Constitution of India — art. 226.
Which court decided this case, and when?
Bombay High Court, on 03 Feb 2005. The bench was S A BOBDE, CHIEF S A BOBDE.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.