Sharp Menthol India Ltd v. The Union of India & Anr.
Case at a glance
Provisions considered
Judgment
Mr. S.M. Kantawala with Mr. H.K. Sudhakara i/by M/s.Khaitan & Co. for the Appellant. Mr. R.B. Raghuwanshi with Mr.Y.S. Bhate with Mr. R.D. Lambey for Union of India. REBELLO &&& CORAM: F.I. CORAM: F.I. REBELLO REBELLO CORAM: F.I. R.S.MOHITE, JJ. R.S.MOHITE, JJ. R.S.MOHITE, JJ. DATED: DECEMBER 13, 2007 DATED: DECEMBER 13, 2007 DATED: DECEMBER 13, 2007 P.C.P.C. P.C. . The Petitioner has filed an application for rebate. The Petitioners drew our attention to the Circular under which the matter has to be processed. . Considering the circular and Para 3 thereof, the Respondents are directed to take a decision and intimate to the Petitioner within seven days from today. . All contentions are left open for consideration in appropriate proceedings. . With the above observations, Petition disposed off. (F.I.REBELLO, J.) (R.S.MOHITE, J.) (F.I.REBELLO, J.) (R.S.MOHITE, J.) (F.I.REBELLO, J.)
(R.S.MOHITE, J.)
Questions this judgment answers
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Code of Civil Procedure, 1908.
Which court decided this case, and when?
Bombay High Court, on 13 Dec 2007. The bench was R S MOHITE, F I REBELLO.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.