✦ Bombay High Court · 18 Nov 2008

Writ Petition No. 2409 of 2008 · Bombay High Court

Writ Petition No. 2409 of 2008A A SAYED, S B MHASE

Case at a glance

Decided
18 Nov 2008
Bench
A A SAYED, S B MHASE

Key paragraphs

  • Para 11. Heard. The applicant is a convict in NDPS case. This is a petition to waive the fine amount. This cannot be done in while exercising power under Article 226 of the Constitution of India. Petition is rejected. (A.A.SAYED, J.) (S.B.MHASE, J.) (A.A.SAYED, J.) (S.B.MHASE…

Judgment

:1::1::1: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE SIDE WRIT PETITION NO. 2409 OF 2008 WRIT PETITION NO. 2409 OF 2008 WRIT PETITION NO. 2409 OF 2008 --------------------------------l------------------------------ Office Notes, Office Memoranda l of Coram, appearances, Court’s l Orders or directions and l Registrar’s orders. l Court’s or Judges’ Order --------------------------------i------------------------------ Indrayani Koparkar for the petitioner. Mrs. Usha Kejariwal A.P.P. for the State. CORAM: S. B. MHASE & CORAM: S. B. MHASE & CORAM: S. B. MHASE & A. A. SAYED, JJJJJJ. A. A. SAYED, A. A. SAYED, DATE: November 18, 2008. DATE: November 18, 2008. DATE: November 18, 2008. P.C.P.C. P.C.

1.

Heard. The applicant is a convict in NDPS case. This is a petition to waive the fine amount. This cannot be done in while exercising power under Article 226 of the Constitution of India. Petition is rejected. (A.A.SAYED, J.) (S.B.MHASE, J.) (A.A.SAYED, J.) (S.B.MHASE, J.) (A.A.SAYED, J.)

(S.B.MHASE, J.)

Questions this judgment answers

Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?

Code of Civil Procedure, 1908; Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985; Constitution of India — art. 226.

Which court decided this case, and when?

Bombay High Court, on 18 Nov 2008. The bench was A A SAYED, S B MHASE.

Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case

No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.

This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.

Why is this linked?

This is the original judgment text, reproduced from the public court record. Always verify it against the official record before relying on it in a filing — check it on Bombay High Court or eCourts case status (search case no. Writ Petition No. 2409 of 2008). ← Search more judgments