✦ Bombay High Court · 09 Oct 2007

ANOOP v. MOHTA, J

Civil Application No. 83 of 2007ANOOP V MOHTA, V MOHTA

Case at a glance

Provisions considered

Key paragraphs

  • Para 22. The application is disposed of, accordingly. ( 2 ) V. MOHTA, J.] [ANOOP V. MOHTA, J.] [ANOOP V. MOHTA, J.] [ANOOP

Judgment

THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY INININ THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 83 OF 2007 CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 83 OF 2007 CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 83 OF 2007 CIVIL INININ 2006 APPEAL (ST) NO. 26082 OF 20062006 FIRST APPEAL (ST) NO. 26082 OF FIRST APPEAL (ST) NO. 26082 OF FIRST - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court’s Orders or directions and Court’s or Judge’s Orders Registrar’s Orders - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Mr. Mayur Thorat i/by Shri Bipin Joshi for the applicant. Mr. J.J.Xavier for the BMC. CORAM : ANOOP V. MOHTA,J. : ANOOP V. MOHTA,J. CORAM CORAM : ANOOP V. MOHTA,J. DATED : 9th October, 2007. : 9th October, 2007. DATED DATED : 9th October, 2007. P.C. P.C.P.C.

1.

Considering the averments made and in view of the fact that the similar matter has been disposed of by this Court by order dated 05/05/2006 and as there is no objection from the other side, the delay in filing the present appeal is condoned.

2.

The application is disposed of, accordingly. ( 2 ) V. MOHTA, J.] [ANOOP V. MOHTA, J.] [ANOOP V. MOHTA, J.] [ANOOP

Questions this judgment answers

Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?

Code of Civil Procedure, 1908.

Which court decided this case, and when?

Bombay High Court, on 09 Oct 2007. The bench was ANOOP V MOHTA, V MOHTA.

Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case

No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.

This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.

Why is this linked?

This is the original judgment text, reproduced from the public court record. Always verify it against the official record before relying on it in a filing — check it on Bombay High Court or eCourts case status (search case no. Civil Application No. 83 of 2007). ← Search more judgments