✦ Bombay High Court · 31 Oct 2012

Mondu Pandu Salunkhe (Chor) v. Laxmen Pandu Salunkhe (Chor)

Judgment

.......... Mr.V.V.Pai, Advocate for the Applicants. ..Applicants ..Respondents Mr. V.B.Konde-Deshmukh, Advocate for the Respondents. .......... CORAM : MRS.MRIDULA BHATKAR, J. DATE : 31ST OCTOBER 2012. P.C. 1 The application for restoration is moved with prayer that order dated 29.8.2012 dismissing the appeal for default be recalled. 2 The learned counsel for the respondents submits to the order of the Court. However, he points out that this is the third time, the appeal is dismissed for want of prosecution. The learned counsel for the applicants submits that appeal is admitted and pending since 1991. ms.s.k.talekar - 2 - 3 As the appeal is already admitted and old one, it is restored. However, the appeal to be listed on the final hearing board in the week commencing from 19th November 2012. 4 The learned counsel for the respondents submitted that he has appeared in the second appeal and he undertakes to file vakalatnama in this application. (JUDGE) ms.s.k.talekar

Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case

No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.

This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.

Why is this linked?

This is the original judgment text, reproduced from the public court record. Always verify it against the official record before relying on it in a filing — check it on Bombay High Court or eCourts case status (search case no. Civil Application No. 1509 of 2012). ← Search more judgments