✦ Bombay High Court

Judgment · High Court

Judgment

Mr. A. M. Sarogi, advocate for the petitioner. Mrs. A. S. Pai, APP for the respondent. : R.M.S. KHANDEPARKAR CORAM : R.M.S. KHANDEPARKAR CORAM : R.M.S. KHANDEPARKAR CORAM ANDANDAND V.K. TAHILRAMANI, JJ. Mrs. Mrs. Mrs. V.K. TAHILRAMANI, JJ. V.K. TAHILRAMANI, JJ. : SEPTEMBER 27, 2007. DATEDATEDATE : SEPTEMBER 27, 2007. : SEPTEMBER 27, 2007. P.C. . The learned advocate for the petitioner states enable petitioner approach Magistrate discharge matter, petitioner craves withdraw petition. The petition allowed withdrawn, accordingly disposed withdrawn. We expressed opinion points, sought to be raised in the matter, and all issues are kept open. R.M.S. KHANDEPARKAR, J.] [[[ R.M.S. KHANDEPARKAR, J.] R.M.S. KHANDEPARKAR, J.] Sd/- V. K. TAHILRAMANI,J.] [Smt. V. K. TAHILRAMANI,J.] [Smt. V. K. TAHILRAMANI,J.] [Smt. Sd/-

Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case

No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.

This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.

Why is this linked?

This is the original judgment text, reproduced from the public court record. Always verify it against the official record before relying on it in a filing — check it on Bombay High Court or eCourts case status (search case no. Writ Petition No. 2651 of 2005). ← Search more judgments