✦ Bombay High Court · 08 Feb 2023

Mangesh @ Mangal Balasaheb Bhise v. State Of Maharashtra & Ors.

Writ Petition No. 3235 of 2022PRAKASH D NAIK, A S GADKARI

Case at a glance

Outcome

Disposed of

Petition is disposed off as withdrawn with aforesaid liberty

Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 3235 OF 2022 Mangesh @ Mangal Balasaheb Bhise ...Petitioner V/s. State Of Maharashtra And Ors. ...Respondents Mr. Gopal Bhosale for Petitioner. Mrs. M.H.Mhatre, A.P.P. for the Respondent-State. CORAM : A. S. GADKARI AND PRAKASH D.NAIK, JJ. DATE : 8th FEBRUARY, 2023. P.C.:- . Learned Advocate for Petitioner on instructions, seeks leave to withdraw present Petition with liberty to challenge sanction accorded by Competent Authority under Section 23(2) of Maharashtra Control of Organised Crime Act, 1999. Leave and liberty granted.

Operative part

2.

Petition is disposed off as withdrawn with aforesaid liberty. (PRAKASH D. NAIK, J.) (A.S. GADKARI, J.) SAJAKALI LIYAKAT JAMADAR Digitally signed by SAJAKALI LIYAKAT JAMADAR 11:37:24 +0530

Questions this judgment answers

What did the Court decide in this case?

The Court recorded the following disposition: Petition is disposed off as withdrawn with aforesaid liberty

Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?

Maharashtra Control of Organised Crime Act, 1999 — s. 23(2).

Which court decided this case, and when?

Bombay High Court, on 08 Feb 2023. The bench was PRAKASH D NAIK, A S GADKARI.

Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case

No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.

This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.

Why is this linked?

This is the original judgment text, reproduced from the public court record. Always verify it against the official record before relying on it in a filing — check it on Bombay High Court or eCourts case status (search case no. Writ Petition No. 3235 of 2022). ← Search more judgments