✦ Bombay High Court · 25 Sep 2009

State Bank of India Officers v. Election Commission of India & Ors.

Writ Petition No. 8530 of 2009H BHATIA, F I REBELLO

Case at a glance

Provisions considered

Judgment

None for the Petitioners. Mr.P.Rajagopal, adv. For the Respondent No.1. CORAM : F.I.REBELLO & J.H. BHATIA, JJ. DATED : 17th December , 2009 P.C. 1 2 Rule. Though none is present on behalf of the petitioners, appearance is put on behalf of the respondent nos.1 to 4. On behalf of the Election Commission, the learned counsel points out that requisition under Section 26 of the People Act, 1951 is made. In such cases, this Court has in Writ Petition Nos.8039, 8089, 8052 and 8111 of 2009 decided on 25th September, 2009 has quashed and set aside the said representation . In the light of that present petition will have to be allowed. 2 3 Rule made absolute in terms of prayer clause (a). (J.H. BHATIA,J.)

(F.I.REBELLO, J.)

Questions this judgment answers

Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?

People Act, 1951 — s. 26.

Which court decided this case, and when?

Bombay High Court, on 25 Sep 2009. The bench was H BHATIA, F I REBELLO.

Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case

No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.

This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.

Why is this linked?

This is the original judgment text, reproduced from the public court record. Always verify it against the official record before relying on it in a filing — check it on Bombay High Court or eCourts case status (search case no. Writ Petition No. 8530 of 2009). ← Search more judgments