Civil Application No. 5318 of 2007 · Bombay High Court
Case at a glance
Provisions considered
Key paragraphs
- Para 22. Considering the averments made in the Civil Application, ad-interim relief as granted earlier, shall continue pending the disposal of the present First Appeal. Civil Application is, accordingly disposed of in terms of prayer clause (b). ( 2 )
- Para 33. The amount so deposited by the Appellant, shall be invested in any Nationalized Bank, initially for the period of one year and renew the same thereafter, accordingly. V. MOHTA, J.] [ANOOP V. MOHTA, J.] [ANOOP V. MOHTA, J.] [ANOOP
Judgment
APPEAL NO.2857 OF 2007 FIRST APPEAL NO.2857 OF 2007 FIRST APPEAL NO.2857 OF 2007 FIRST - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court’s Orders or directions and Registrar’s Orders Court’s or Judge’s Orders - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Mr.M.R.Patil for the Applicant. Mr.N.G.Ghotenkar for Respondent No.3. : ANOOP V. MOHTA,J. CORAM : ANOOP V. MOHTA,J. CORAM : ANOOP V. MOHTA,J. CORAM DATED : 21st April, 2008 : 21st April, 2008 DATED DATED : 21st April, 2008 P.C. P.C.P.C. . Pursuant to the order of this Court, the Appellant has already deposited the total decretal amount.
Considering the averments made in the Civil Application, ad-interim relief as granted earlier, shall continue pending the disposal of the present First Appeal. Civil Application is, accordingly disposed of in terms of prayer clause (b). ( 2 )
The amount so deposited by the Appellant, shall be invested in any Nationalized Bank, initially for the period of one year and renew the same thereafter, accordingly. V. MOHTA, J.] [ANOOP V. MOHTA, J.] [ANOOP V. MOHTA, J.] [ANOOP
Questions this judgment answers
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Code of Civil Procedure, 1908.
Which court decided this case, and when?
Bombay High Court, on 21 Apr 2008. The bench was ANOOP V MOHTA, V MOHTA.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.