ASHUTOSH PANDEY v. DIRECTORATE GENERAL OF GST
Case at a glance
Outcome
Withdrawn
Application is disposed of as withdrawn with liberty as
Provisions considered
Judgment
Operative part
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO. 1854 OF 2026 ASHUTOSH PANDEY S/O UMESH PANDEY ….. APPLICANT VS DIRECTORATE GENERAL OF GST INTELLIGENCE & ANR. ….. RESPONDENTS Adv. Dashang Doshi i/b. Dewani Associates for the Applicant. Adv. Shyamrishi Pathak a/w. Adv. Sangeeta Yadav, Adv. Umesh Gupta, Adv. Jyoti R. Barai for the Respondent No.1. Mr. Arfan Sait, APP for the Respondent – State. CORAM : PRAFULLA S. KHUBALKAR, J. DATE : 21ST AUGUST, 2026 P.C. :- 1) In view of the judgment of Hon’ble Supreme Court in the matter of Union of India vs. Sunil Biyani in SLP (Cri) No. 12535 of 2026 dated 12th August, 2026, learned counsel for the applicant seeks permission to withdraw the instant application with liberty to file fresh application, in case an order under Section 69 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 is served upon the applicant. Permission is granted. Application is disposed of as withdrawn with liberty as 2) 3) prayed for.
[PRAFULLA S. KHUBALKAR, J.]
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: Application is disposed of as withdrawn with liberty as
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 — s. 69.
Which court decided this case, and when?
Bombay High Court, on 21 Aug 2026. The bench was PRAFULLA S KHUBALKAR.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.