Mrs Ranjana Balkrishna Bulbule v. The State of Maharashtra
Case at a glance
- Decided
- 25 Oct 2007
- Bench
- V C DAGA
Outcome
Disposed of
Application is disposed of in above
Provisions considered
- Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 s. 438
- Indian Penal Code, 1860 ss. 34, 306
Key paragraphs
- Para 66. In the result, in my view, the applicant entitled pre-arrest bail. In arrest, released connection C. R.No. 174 2007 registered Solapur Taluka Police Station I.P.C. Section 306 Section 34 subject furnishing a personal bond Rs. 25,000/- surety like amount on following terms and conditions.…
Judgment
Heard learned counsel for the applicant and learned APP for the State.
Perused the application and material available on record.
The applicant is seeking anticipatory Section 438 Cr.P.C. C.R. No. 174 2007 registered Solapur Taluka Police Station, offence punishable under Section 306 read with Section 34 of the I.P.C.
According to the learned counsel for the applicant, deceased Anil Khataokar served a Manager father present applicant establishment namely, "M/s. Natraj Hosiery Center" period 25 30 years. After demise father applicant, Anil Khataokar ( 2 ) active partner business knowledge business, Anil allowed entire business. Anil looked entire business. partner. The applicant a sleeping There dispute between partners regard settlement accounts. However, applicant submits she cannot be held responsible for the suicide committed by Anil Khataokar.
Considering the fact that the dispute between nature question : extent applicant responsible suicide committed Anil. This question ultimately decided trial. However, nothing incriminating against applicant. She being a woman would be entitled for special consideration.
Operative part
In the result, in my view, the applicant entitled pre-arrest bail. In arrest, released connection C. R.No. 174 2007 registered Solapur Taluka Police Station I.P.C. Section 306 Section 34 subject furnishing a personal bond Rs. 25,000/- surety like amount on following terms and conditions. ( 3 ) a] The applicant shall report to above Police Station once in a week i.e. on every Saturday between 3.00 to 5.00 p. m. till filing of the charge sheet. b] Upon filing charge regular before regular c] The applicant not, directly indirectly, inducement court. threat prosecution witnesses manner tamper prosecution evidence. d] The applicant shall co-operate with the Investigating Agency in investigation. e] Any observation made in this order shall not be construed as any finding or any expression of opinion on the merits of the case at the time of trial. f] Breach conditions result cancellation order. ( 4 ) Application is disposed of in above
terms. DAGA,J.) (V.C. DAGA,J.) (V.C. DAGA,J.) (V.C.
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: Application is disposed of in above
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 — s. 438; Indian Penal Code, 1860 — ss. 34, 306.
Which court decided this case, and when?
Bombay High Court, on 25 Oct 2007. The bench was V C DAGA.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.