Bombay Environment Action v. Indian Aluminium Co. Ltd & Ors.
Judgment
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 2244 OF 1998 Bombay Environment Action Group and Anr. ..Petitioners Versus Indian Aluminium Co. Ltd. & Ors. ..Respondents None for Petitioner. Mr. V.S.Ghokhale Assistant Government Pleader for Respondent nos. 3 to 5. CORAM : D. D. SINHA AND SMT. V. K. TAHILRAMANI, JJ. DATE : 22nd August, 2011 P.C. : 1 2 3 Counsel for the petitioners is absent. Dismissed for want of prosecution. No order as to costs. [SMT. V.K.TAHILRMANI, J. ] [ D. D. SINHA, J.]
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.
This is the original judgment text, reproduced from the public court record.
Always verify it against the official record before relying on it in a filing — check it on
Bombay High Court or eCourts case status (search case no. Writ Petition No. 2244 of 1998).
← Search more judgments