Mohammed Yunus Abdul Shaikh v. The State of Maharashtra & Anr.
Case at a glance
Provisions considered
Judgment
We have heard the learned counsel for the applicant, considered reasoning Court support conviction satisfied case made release the accused no.1 on bail pending appeal, under Section 389 of Cr.P.C. . The application is rejected. However, the applicant liberty submit a private certified Registry 3 early hearing of the appeal on the paper book being ready. (SMT.R.S.DALVI,J.)
(B.H.MARLAPALLE,J.)
Questions this judgment answers
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Indian Penal Code, 1860 — s. 34; Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 — s. 389.
Which court decided this case, and when?
Bombay High Court, on 13 Jul 1999. The bench was R S DALVI, B H MARLAPALLE.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.