Judgment · High Court · 2009
Case at a glance
Outcome
Dismissed
Hence the Appeal is dismissed as
Provisions considered
- Family Courts Act, 1984 ss. 19, 19(1)
Key paragraphs
- Para 33. Hence the Appeal is dismissed as not maintainable. (S.J.VAZIFDAR, J.) (B.H.MARLAPALLE, J.)
Judgment
Operative part
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: Hence the Appeal is dismissed as
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Family Courts Act, 1984 — ss. 19, 19(1).
Which court decided this case, and when?
Bombay High Court, on 21 Apr 2009. The bench was S VAZIFDAR, B H MARLAPALLE.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.
This is the original judgment text, reproduced from the public court record.
Always verify it against the official record before relying on it in a filing — check it on
Bombay High Court or eCourts case status.
← Search more judgments