Civil Application No. 1229 of 2004 · Bombay High Court
Case at a glance
- Decided
- 10 Dec 2010
- Bench
- D G KARNIK
Outcome
Dismissed
The Appeal is dismissed under Order 41,
Provisions considered
- Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 O. 41 r. 17
Judgment
Operative part
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE APPEAL FROM ORDER NO. 900 OF 2004 ALONGWITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 1229 OF 2004 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Court's or Judge's Orders Coram, appearances, Court's Orders or directions and Registrar's Orders None for the Appellant. Mr. Samir Kumbhakoni for Respondents 1 to 3. --- CORAM : D.G. KARNIK, J. DATE : 10th DECEMBER, 2010 P.C.:- 1 None appears for the Appellant when called. 2 Learned counsel for Respondents 1 to 3 is present. 3 The Appeal is dismissed under Order 41, Rule 17 of the Code of Civil Procedure. 4 In view of the dismissal of the Appeal, the Civil Application No. 1229/2004 does not survive and the same is disposed of as such.
(D.G. KARNIK, J.)
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: The Appeal is dismissed under Order 41,
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 — O. 41 r. 17.
Which court decided this case, and when?
Bombay High Court, on 10 Dec 2010. The bench was D G KARNIK.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.