Mrs. Kamal Shankar Bansode v. The State of Maharashtra & Anr.
Case at a glance
- Decided
- 17 Aug 2010
- Bench
- ANOOP V MOHTA, B H MARLAPALLE
Outcome
Disposed of
Petition is disposed off with liberty to
Provisions considered
- Constitution of India art. 226
Judgment
Operative part
Ms. FAtimaKhan i/by Mr. A.M. Sarogi for the Petitioner. Mr. J.P. Yagnik, A.P.P. for State. CORAM: B.H. MARLAPALLE & ANOOP V. MOHTA, JJ. DATED: 17TH AUGUST, 2010 P. C.: By this petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, Petitioner prays for directions to Respondent No.1 to hold appropriate enquiry and investigation in respect of the amounts collected by Minakshi Coop. Hsg. Society (Proposed). On the facts of this case and having regard to the allegations made in this petition, it would be proper that the Petitioner is relegated to the remedy of filing a private complaint before the appropriate forum. Petition is disposed off with liberty to file a private complaint. (ANOOP V. MOHTA,J.)
(B.H. MARLAPALLE,J.)
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: Petition is disposed off with liberty to
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Constitution of India — art. 226.
Which court decided this case, and when?
Bombay High Court, on 17 Aug 2010. The bench was ANOOP V MOHTA, B H MARLAPALLE.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.