✦ Bombay High Court

Judgment · High Court

Case at a glance

Outcome

Withdrawn

be withdrawn and is disposed of as withdrawn

Judgment

Mr. A. S. Gadkari, APP for respondent No. 1 & 2. : R.M.S. KHANDEPARKAR CORAM : R.M.S. KHANDEPARKAR CORAM : R.M.S. KHANDEPARKAR CORAM ANDANDAND V.K. TAHILRAMANI, JJ. Mrs. Mrs. Mrs. V.K. TAHILRAMANI, JJ. V.K. TAHILRAMANI, JJ. : OCTOBER 18, 2007. DATEDATEDATE : OCTOBER 18, 2007. : OCTOBER 18, 2007. P.C. . Learned APP states that the police already charge matter. Consequent advocate statement, learned petitioner states reserving petitioner objections before concerned court, petitioner craves withdraw petition. Petition is accordingly allowed to be withdrawn and is disposed of as withdrawn. R.M.S. KHANDEPARKAR, J.] [[[ R.M.S. KHANDEPARKAR, J.] R.M.S. KHANDEPARKAR, J.] Sd/- Sd/- V. K. TAHILRAMANI,J.] [Smt. V. K. TAHILRAMANI,J.] [Smt. V. K. TAHILRAMANI,J.] [Smt.

Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case

No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.

This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.

Why is this linked?

This is the original judgment text, reproduced from the public court record. Always verify it against the official record before relying on it in a filing — check it on Bombay High Court or eCourts case status (search case no. Writ Petition No. 1744 of 2007). ← Search more judgments