Nandkumar Digambar Jamodekar v. Manohar Gopinath Wadkar
Case at a glance
Provisions considered
Judgment
Nandkumar Digambar Jamodekar. Vs. Manohar Gopinath Wadkar. .... Mr. S. S. Hardikar for the Petitioner. ..... ...Petitioner. ...Respondent CORAM : DR. D.Y. CHANDRACHUD, J. April 12, 2006. P.C.: A perusal of the finding contained in paragraph 9 of the impugned judgment and order of the Additional District Judge, Baramati, would show that the property in question belongs to the Shrikrishna Mandir Trust which was registered in 1955 under the Bombay Public Trusts Act, 1950. A scheme was framed by the Charity Commissioner and five trustees were appointed in 1985. The property vests in the Trust. The original Plaintiff filed a suit (316 of 1988) against the Charity Commissioner and the trustees for a declaration that the property is a private property and for injunction. The suit was dismissed on 20th March 1989. The Plaintiff does not have any interest in the property. The Additional 2 District Judge was, therefore justified in holding that the suit at the behest of the Plaintiff is not maintainable. The petition shall accordingly stand dismissed. .......
Questions this judgment answers
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Bombay Public Trusts Act, 1950.
Which court decided this case, and when?
Bombay High Court, on 20 Mar 1989. The bench was D Y CHANDRACHUD.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.