CRIMINAL v. The State of Maharashtra
Case at a glance
- Decided
- 24 Sep 2004
- Bench
- V G PALSHIKAR, ANOOP V MOHTA, V MOHTA, ANOOP
Provisions considered
Key paragraphs
- Para 11. Criminal Appeal No.582/2004 admitted action section 390 Cr.P.C. ordered. Accordingly respondent/present applicants should appear before concerned Judge appearence shall release them on bail in the sum of Rs. 10,000/- each. ....
Judgment
Shri S.P.Kadam for the petitioner/applicant. Mrs. U.V.Kejariwal APP for the State. ..... ..... CORAM ; V.G.PALSHIKAR ; V.G.PALSHIKAR &&& CORAM CORAM ; V.G.PALSHIKAR ANOOP V. MOHTA, JJ. V. MOHTA, JJ. ANOOP ANOOP V. MOHTA, JJ. DATED; 24TH SEPTEMBER, 2004. 24TH SEPTEMBER, 2004. DATED; DATED; 24TH SEPTEMBER, 2004. P.C.; P.C.; P.C.;
Criminal Appeal No.582/2004 admitted action section 390 Cr.P.C. ordered. Accordingly respondent/present applicants should appear before concerned Judge appearence shall release them on bail in the sum of Rs. 10,000/- each. ....
Questions this judgment answers
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 — s. 390.
Which court decided this case, and when?
Bombay High Court, on 24 Sep 2004. The bench was V G PALSHIKAR, ANOOP V MOHTA, V MOHTA, ANOOP.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.