✦ Bombay High Court · 25 Aug 2004

Section v. Section

CLAIM PETITION No. 1066 of 1996F I REBELLO, ANOOP V MOHTA5 min read

Case at a glance

Provisions considered

Judgment

judgment of the Apex Court, we are of the view that 6 the law on the subject stands concluded. . For the aforesaid reasons, we find no merit in the appeal which is accordingly dismissed. (F.I. REBELLO,J.)

(ANOOP V. MOHTA,J.)

Questions this judgment answers

Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?

Motor Vehicles Act, 1988.

Which court decided this case, and when?

Bombay High Court, on 25 Aug 2004. The bench was F I REBELLO, ANOOP V MOHTA.

Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case

No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.

This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.

Why is this linked?

This is the original judgment text, reproduced from the public court record. Always verify it against the official record before relying on it in a filing — check it on Bombay High Court or eCourts case status (search case no. CLAIM PETITION No. 1066 of 1996). ← Search more judgments