The State of Maharashtra v. Raghunath D. Raut & Ors.
Case at a glance
- Decided
- 09 Mar 2006
- Bench
- D G DESHPANDE, V K TAHILRAMANI
Provisions considered
Judgment
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE SIDE, JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPELLATE SIDE, JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPELLATE SIDE, JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.5486 OF 2005 CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.5486 OF 2005 CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.5486 OF 2005 The State of Maharashtra ...Applicant. Versus Versus Versus Raghunath D. Raut & Ors. ...Respondents. .... Mrs.P.H.Kantharia, APP, for the State. Mr.S.V.Marwadi, Advocate for the Respondent Nos.2,3 & 4. .... CORAM : D.G.DESHPANDE AND CORAM : D.G.DESHPANDE AND CORAM : D.G.DESHPANDE AND SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI, JJ. SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI, JJ. SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI, JJ. DATED : MARCH 09, 2006. DATED : MARCH 09, 2006. DATED : MARCH 09, 2006. P.C.: . Heard learned A.P.P for the State and Mr.Marwadi learned Advocate for respondent Nos.2,3 & 4. This is a double murder case. According to the learnd A.P.P. there is one eye witness and one servant. Both have been disbelieved on the ground of unsustainability in law. Leave granted. Appeal is admitted. Action under Section 390 of Cr.P.C. before the trial Court. The trial Court will consider the fact that the accused were on bail during the trial. (D.G.DESHPANDE, J.) (D.G.DESHPANDE, J.) (D.G.DESHPANDE, J.) :2: (SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J.) (SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J.)
(SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J.)
Questions this judgment answers
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 — s. 390.
Which court decided this case, and when?
Bombay High Court, on 09 Mar 2006. The bench was D G DESHPANDE, V K TAHILRAMANI.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.