Mr.S.R.Borulkar P.P. with Ms S.V.Gajare,A.P.P. for State v. Sanjay Arun Uke
Case at a glance
Provisions considered
Key paragraphs
- Para 11. For the reasons recorded in Criminal Application No. 2937 of 2006, following order is passed : APPLICATION NO.3078 OF 2006 CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.3078 OF 2006 CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.3078 OF 2006 CRIMINAL . This Application is covered by Clause (a) of sub section 1 of…
Judgment
Mr.S.R.Borulkar P.P. with Ms S.V.Gajare,A.P.P. for State. APPLICATION NO.2975 OF 2006 CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.2975 OF 2006 CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.2975 OF 2006 CRIMINAL WITH The State of Maharashtra vs. Sanjay Arun Uke ...Applicant ...Respondent None for the Respondent. Mr.S.R.Borulkar P.P. with Mr.A.S.Shitole,A.P.P. for State. WITH CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.494 OF 2006 APPLICATION NO.494 OF 2006 CRIMINAL CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.494 OF 2006 INININ CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.2832 OF 2006 APPLICATION NO.2832 OF 2006 CRIMINAL CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.2832 OF 2006 The State of Maharashtra ...Applicant vs. Dilip Zaverchand Savani and others ...Respondents None for the Respondents. Mr.S.R.Borulkar P.P. with Mr.U.V.Nikam,A.P.P. for State. WITH CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.504 OF 2006 APPLICATION NO.504 OF 2006 CRIMINAL CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.504 OF 2006 INININ CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.2858 OF 2006 APPLICATION NO.2858 OF 2006 CRIMINAL CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.2858 OF 2006 The State of Maharashtra ...Applicant vs. Satish Manohar Jadhav and others ...Respondents None for the Respondents. Mr.S.R.Borulkar P.P. with Mr.A.S.Shitole,A.P.P. for State. WITH CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.515 OF 2006 APPLICATION NO.515 OF 2006 CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.515 OF 2006 CRIMINAL INININ APPLICATION NO.2880 OF 2006 CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.2880 OF 2006 CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.2880 OF 2006 CRIMINAL The State of Maharashtra ...Applicant vs. Mobin Sirajuddin Shaikh and others ...Respondents -2- None for the Respondents. Mr.S.R.Borulkar P.P. with Ms S.V.Gajare,A.P.P. for State. CORAM: A.S.OKA,J. CORAM: A.S.OKA,J. CORAM: A.S.OKA,J. DATE ON WHICH SUBMISSIONS WERE HEARD: OCTOBER 11,2006 DATE ON WHICH SUBMISSIONS WERE HEARD: OCTOBER 11,2006 DATE ON WHICH SUBMISSIONS WERE HEARD: OCTOBER 11,2006 DATE ON WHICH THE JUDGMENT IS PRONOUNCED: NOVEMBER 17,2006. DATE ON WHICH THE JUDGMENT IS PRONOUNCED: NOVEMBER 17,2006. DATE ON WHICH THE JUDGMENT IS PRONOUNCED: NOVEMBER 17,2006. P.C.: P.C.: P.C.:
For the reasons recorded in Criminal Application No. 2937 of 2006, following order is passed : APPLICATION NO.3078 OF 2006 CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.3078 OF 2006 CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.3078 OF 2006 CRIMINAL . This Application is covered by Clause (a) of sub section 1 of section 378 of Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 ( as amended). Hence, this Application alongwith its accompaniments be returned to the Public Prosecutor for presentation to the proper Court. CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.2975 OF 2006 APPLICATION NO.2975 OF 2006 CRIMINAL CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.2975 OF 2006 . This Application is covered by Clause (a) of sub section 1 of section 378 of Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 ( as amended). Hence, this Application alongwith its accompaniments be returned to the Public Prosecutor for presentation to the proper Court. APPLICATION NO.494 OF 2006 CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.494 OF 2006 CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.494 OF 2006 CRIMINAL INININ APPLICATION NO.2832 OF 2006 CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.2832 OF 2006 CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.2832 OF 2006 CRIMINAL -3- . The Application for leave to prefer an Appeal is not maintainable in this Court. Hence, Criminal Application No.494 of 2006 as well as Criminal Application No.2832 of 2006 be returned to the Public Prosecutor for presentation to the proper Court. APPLICATION NO.504 OF 2006 CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.504 OF 2006 CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.504 OF 2006 CRIMINAL INININ APPLICATION NO.2858 OF 2006 CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.2858 OF 2006 CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.2858 OF 2006 CRIMINAL . The Application for leave to prefer an Appeal is not maintainable in this Court. Office is directed to return the papers of Criminal Application No.504/2006 as well as Criminal Application No.2858/2006 along with its accompaniments to the Public Prosecutor for presentation to the proper court. APPLICATION NO.515 OF 2006 CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.515 OF 2006 CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.515 OF 2006 CRIMINAL INININ CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.2880 OF 2006 APPLICATION NO.2880 OF 2006 CRIMINAL CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.2880 OF 2006 . The Application for leave to prefer an Appeal is not maintainable in this Court. Therefore, office is directed to return the papers of Criminal Application No.515/2006 as well as Criminal Application No.2880/2006 to the Public Prosecutor for presentation to the proper court. -4- JUDGE JUDGE JUDGE
Questions this judgment answers
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 — s. 378.
Which court decided this case, and when?
Bombay High Court, on 17 Nov 2006. The bench was A S OKA.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.