✦ Bombay High Court · 04 Aug 2005

Narendra M. Mehta v. C.B.I. EOW, Mumbai & Anr.

Criminal Revision Application No. 371 of 2004A S OKA3 min read

Case at a glance

Decided
04 Aug 2005
Bench
A S OKA

Provisions considered

Judgment

:

O R D E R : : O R D E R : : O R D E R : i) The impugned Order dated 07th July, 2004 is quashed and set aside and the Application for discharge made by the Applicant is restored to file. ii) The learned Additional Sessions Judge, Mumbai will decide the said Application for discharge afresh in the light of the additional material which is produced by the Applicant in this Criminal Revision Application in the form of documents at Exhibit G, H and I.

iii) Both the parties will be at liberty to produce additional material before the learned Additional Sessions Judge. iv) Application for discharge will be decided by the concerned Judge as expeditiously as possible. v) All questions on merits are kept open. vi) Parties to act upon an authenticated copy of ...4... this order. JUDGE JUDGE JUDGE

Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case

No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.

This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.

Why is this linked?

This is the original judgment text, reproduced from the public court record. Always verify it against the official record before relying on it in a filing — check it on Bombay High Court or eCourts case status (search case no. Criminal Revision Application No. 371 of 2004). ← Search more judgments