✦ Bombay High Court · 31 Jan 2008

Chandrakant Ganesh Chikurde v. (Vhawal) & Ors.

Writ Petition No. 5562 of 2003S C DHARMADHIKARI

Case at a glance

Provisions considered

Judgment

Mr.Rupesh Bobade Adv. for the petitioners. Mr.S.G.Deshmukh Adv. for the respondents. CORAM: S.C.DHARMADHIKARI, J. DATED: 31ST JANUARY, 2008. P.C. : : : P.C.P.C.

1.

Petition allowed to be withdrawn with liberty to make appropriate application in a Civil Suit which has been filed by the present petitioner being Special Civil Suit No. 173 of 2002. To enable the petitioner to make an application, the ad-interim order passed by this court on 1.9.2003 to continue for a period of four weeks.

2.

Needless to clarify that, if no orders are obtained :2::2::2: by the petitioner in his independent proceedings, then, the ad-interim order stands automatically vacated without any further reference to the court. Under no circumstances, the ad-interim order will be extended. sd/- ******

Questions this judgment answers

Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?

Code of Civil Procedure, 1908.

Which court decided this case, and when?

Bombay High Court, on 31 Jan 2008. The bench was S C DHARMADHIKARI.

Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case

No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.

This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.

Why is this linked?

This is the original judgment text, reproduced from the public court record. Always verify it against the official record before relying on it in a filing — check it on Bombay High Court or eCourts case status (search case no. Writ Petition No. 5562 of 2003). ← Search more judgments