R.M. AMBERKAR v. Anupam Anand
Judgment
Ms. Madhubala Shetty a/w Gypson John for the Applicant Mr. Darshan R. Mehta i/by M/s. Dhruve Liladhar & Co for the .................... Respondent ................... CORAM : K. R. SHRIRAM & MILIND N. JADHAV, JJ. DATE : JUNE 30, 2022 : P.C.
Ms. Shetty appearing for applicant states that interim application is for restoration of family court appeal which came to be dismissed for default but the interim application is shown inadvertently under caption “for withdrawal”.
We have considered the averments in the application. For reasons mentioned therein, appeal is restored to file.
Interim application stands disposed.
Family court appeal to come up for hearing in due course. [ MILIND N. JADHAV, J. ] [ K. R. SHRIRAM, J.] RAVINDRA MOHAN AMBERKAR Digitally signed by RAVINDRA MOHAN AMBERKAR 11:06:53 +0530 1 of 1
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.