✦ Bombay High Court · 24 Nov 2004

Bhagwan Sarawati Tambe v. The State of Maharashtra

Criminal Application No. 3708 of 2004V M KANADE

Case at a glance

Decided
24 Nov 2004
Bench
V M KANADE

Provisions considered

Judgment

Mr.Naveen Chomal for the applicant. Mr.A.M. Shringarpure, APP for the State. CORAM : V.M. KANADE, J DATED : 24th November 2004. P.C:-

1.

Heard the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the applicant and the learned APP appearing on behalf of the State.

2.

The applicant who is convicted by the trial Court u/s.304 of the IPC and sentenced to undergo RI for 10 years. The prosecution case is that the accused assaulted his father-in-law with an iron pipe on his head, chin and knee, and he succumbed to the injuries and the applicant was charged u/s.302 of the IPC and on conviction the offence was converted to section 304(I). The applicant is in jail from the date of the incident and has already undergone 2 1/2 years of sentence. It appears from the fact that there was a sudden fight and the accused gave a blow on the head of the deceased. The appeal in any case is not likely to come up for hearing for some time.

3.

The learned counsel for the applicant has taken me through the extract of the post mortem notes and out of the three injuries, the injury on the scalp has caused the death. The other injuries are simple injuries. In view of these facts, I am of the view that the applicant is entitled to be released on bail.

4.

The applicant to be released on bail in the sum of Rs.5,000/- with one or two sureties in the like amount. He shall however report to Nashik Road Police station once in a month. V.M. KANADE, J

Questions this judgment answers

Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?

Indian Penal Code, 1860 — ss. 302, 304.

Which court decided this case, and when?

Bombay High Court, on 24 Nov 2004. The bench was V M KANADE.

Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case

No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.

This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.

Why is this linked?

This is the original judgment text, reproduced from the public court record. Always verify it against the official record before relying on it in a filing — check it on Bombay High Court or eCourts case status (search case no. Criminal Application No. 3708 of 2004). ← Search more judgments