Civil Appeal No. 1832 of 2006 · Bombay High Court
Case at a glance
- Decided
- 11 Aug 2006
- Bench
- A S OKA
Provisions considered
Judgment
1.
Heard Advocate Appellant. He states Section 170 Motor Vehicle Act, 1988 was granted in favour of the Appellant.
2.
Admit. Hearing is expedited.
3.
The Printing dispensed with. Appellants directed private along with sufficient number copies thereof within a period months today. If within stipulated period, Appeal dismissed prosecution without further reference to the Court. JUDGE JUDGE JUDGE
Questions this judgment answers
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Code of Civil Procedure, 1908; Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 — s. 170.
Which court decided this case, and when?
Bombay High Court, on 11 Aug 2006. The bench was A S OKA.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.
This is the original judgment text, reproduced from the public court record.
Always verify it against the official record before relying on it in a filing — check it on
Bombay High Court or eCourts case status (search case no. Civil Appeal No. 1832 of 2006).
← Search more judgments